Number 67; February 1, 2004
Grand Canyon and Colorado River
1968 photo by David Mendosa
This newsletter keeps you up-to-date with new articles, Web pages, and books that I have written about diabetes.
My most recent contribution is:
I wrote about it once before in my book What Makes My Blood Glucose Level Go Up—and Down? Jennie Brand-Miller, Kaye Foster-Powell and I are the joint authors. But since I doubt if all of you have the book—and because I added new information—I think most of you will find this a useful article. It’s on my website at Acidic Foods.
Update:
Some time ago I realized that hearts of palm are very low carb. In fact, I list them on my Free Foods Web page. But you know, don’t you, how hard it is to eat a new food? It is for me, so my only can of hearts of palm languished in my cupboard until I got brave a couple of weeks ago. In the event I was most pleasantly surprised by the mild taste of the hearts of palm. Even more, I am delighted that the recipe on the can calls for a vinaigrette, thus offering the advantages of the acidic foods that I write about this month.
The recipe, which is also online at My Favorite Low Carb and Low GI Foods is:
Hearts of Palm with Vinaigrette
Ingredients:
1 can hearts of palm (7.75 ounces drained)
1 white onion, finely chopped
1 tomato, finely chopped
1/3 cup black olives, sliced
1/2 cup cider vinegar (you can substitute white wine or red wine vinegar)
1/2 cup olive oil
salt and pepper to taste
Preparation:
Mix together all ingredients except hearts of palm.
Refrigerate for 2 to 3 hours.
Add hearts of palm to mixture, stir, and serve.
My reply was short and to the point:
The first thing your brother needs to do in order to get his tea accepted by people with diabetes and those who treat them is to make it available to scientists and researchers. They can then carry out studies of its use by many test subjects. These clinical trials should ideally be randomized, placebo-controlled, and double blind. Finally, the scientists and researchers need to present the results of their research in a peer-reviewed publication that is included in PubMed. Only then will people with diabetes and those who treat them in America accept the validity of your brother's claims.
Later, as I mulled over that question and my reply I realized that the Web needs to do a better job of exposing unsound “cures” and other treatments of diabetes. While I don’t have the medical credentials to debunk these claims, my friend Bill Quick, a respected endocrinologist, does. I asked him to continue to Diabetes Quackery page that he and his wife Stephanie Schwartz had developed for Diabetes Monitor before they sold the site. They immediately agreed as noted in the announcements below.
At the same time I kept reflecting on my reply that clinical trials should be randomized, placebo-controlled, and double blind. I had learned those requirements from Steven Bratman, M.D., the creator of The Natural Pharmacist Natural Medicine Encyclopedia (TNP), a world-class database of information on alternative medicine, when I interviewed him four years ago for my American Diabetes Association column on Alternative Diabetes.
Consequently, I wrote him last month to see if he had any update to what he had told me. He certainly did and authorized me to reprint it here. His article on Double-Blind Studies is a beautifully written and outstanding analysis of one of the 20th century’s major scientific advances and one with consequences of a magnitude greater than is generally understood.
When I interviewed Dr. Bratman four years ago he told me that studies of alternative therapies in Asian countries including China, India, and Thailand are suspect, however, because they almost always get positive results—something that doesn’t happen in real life. But the countries he mentions in his article are China and Russia.
“Personally, I don't trust any double blind studies from Asia (not even Japan) nor Eastern Europe,” he replied, when I asked him about this difference. “But the objective evidence of unreliable results regards China and Russia.” And he sent me his source for that statement, an article that systematically reviewed controlled trials.
Note that Dr. Bratman is no longer associated with The Natural Pharmacist Natural Medicine Encyclopedia. There was nothing better for evaluating alternative medicine claims, but it is no longer being updated. The version at Memorial Hospital Jacksonville was updated most recently.
Announcements:
This section of their website, which they call “Too Good to be True?,” exposes scams, quackery, and simply questionable treatments and purported cures for diabetes. There are probably no better people for this task than Bill and Steph. When they ran Diabetes Monitor, they developed a useful Web page summarizing some of the more egregious schemes to separate you from your money. That page is still available, and its address is Diabetes Quackery.
These efforts by Bill and Steph complement those of Dr. Stephen Barrett on his Quackwatch site. I interviewed him for my column on the American Diabetes Association website, which is now online at http://www.mendosa.com/quackwatch.htm. Dr. Barrett has an large and outstanding site that does include some diabetes quacks. But there are so many quacks at large that he simply doesn’t have time to debunk many of them. That leaves a huge hole for Bill and Steph to fill. But I have known them for years and know that they are up to the challenge.
Archives:
I now send out Diabetes Update once a month. Previous issues are online:
This is a one-way “broadcast” mailing list that is not set up to accept replies. If you have any questions or wish to unsubscribe, simply write me at mendosa@mendosa.com. If your friends want to receive Diabetes Update, all they have to do is write me here
Thanks for joining!
© Copyright 2004 David Mendosa. All Rights Reserved.
David Mendosa:
A Writer on the Web: www.mendosa.com
E-mail: mendosa@mendosa.com
Office: 993 E. Moorhead Circle Suite 2F, Boulder, CO 80305